You know, in television, movies, and school, they (again, the proverbial, omniscient "they") always make it sound like there's a bold, mile-wide distinction between the good choices and the bad choices. Good choices are sometimes harder to make, but you're supposed to be able to feel in your heart that it's right and it'll pay off in the end. Bad choices are the easy, risky roads that will inevitably cause you to destroy your body, end up in federal prison, and vicariously kill all those who love you.
Depending on who you are, some decisions will always be distinctly good or bad, no questions asked. In my mind, smoking, excessive drinking, murder, and incest will always be bad choices. Wearing seatbelts, attending classes, and not hitting pedestrians, conversely, will always be good ones. These are all things that have, or can have, immediate consequences, though. Smoke, and you gunk up your lungs. Don't attend class, and you possibly fail classes. Etc. This grand master rating system begins to fail once the implications fall farther into the future. And what happens during a conflict of interest, when you're either misguided by your heart or by someone who tells you not to follow it? Or there's the times when neither path is particularly good, and the choice simply becomes between the lesser of two evils. You can analyze possible consequences, benefits, affects on your life financially, emotionally, physically, intellectually, socially, spiritually, (grammatically...), but all you're likely to come up with is a complicated and lengthy list of pros and cons.
I don't know where I'm going with this. I just tend to think about things that intrigue me, and after extended trains of thought, conclude, "Yep, not much you can do." Or I guess in this case, the conclusion would be, "Just do your best."